Chief of Naval Operations - Latest Comments

Re: Kill Chain Approach

Michael Crabtree — Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:13:36 -0000

Before being critical, I do find the basic mechanisms sound and true. And these of course are only my opinions and perspective to what is being implemented. That being said, there seem to be a few problems with this approach in my opinion. First, there is nothing to indicate or determine what other policies this function may effect. For example, what if you are implementing an Emissions Control policy in order to alter your electronic signature to the enemy. There is nothing more apparent then an active weapon system. So the ability to locate and track an enemy may break another policy or standard in effect. The next is the positioning and selection of the weapon of choice. We communicate to the shooting platform, but what about Electronic Warfare. There are a multitude of conditions that generate ideal defensive patterns. The position, speed, and other atmospheric conditions of the potential target. Selecting the weapons of choice is critical because positioning for a missile defense, may not be ideal for a gun defense, and may not take point defense systems into consideration, not to mention Electronic Warfare systems that not only include a multitude of active jamming selections, but mechanical means such as chaff or flares.
Launching the attack is great, but what happens when it doesn't work. An Aegis equipped ship always thinks in hard kill using missile first. An Electronic Warfare defense is not always apparent as to it's effectiveness until the last moments. That is too arbitrary for most, and a hard kill even if not the optimal weapon is selected for comfort and feedback. Speaking of feedback, where is it in this plan. What if the threat defeats the first defensive attack, when and how do alternate methods go into affect? This baseline of weapons release on a target is valid in an offensive nature, but what happens when it's for defensive measures. Not to mention multiple and varied attacks. What if there is a torpedo threat, an airborne missile threat, and an electronic warfare threat all at once? I loved the capability of Aegis, but was always disappointed in defensive exercises because of course the Aegis weapons system was always selected, and we never considered a failure. Simple, just like the kill chains. The problem in the real world we may not want to kill everything, and what happens when the plan doesn't work. How are we monitoring for effectiveness, and adjusting for the new and changing threat? It is a good core, but runs the risk of not considering all aspects of methods available. It doesn't seem to constantly evaluate effectiveness, and implement needed adjustments. It doesn't set up for the next level, if the main missile fails then what? Are we in a position to effectively implement the other weapons to defeat the threat. And are we constantly on watch and effective for other threats? I realize that to simplify the concepts the core ideas are only defined, but I believe a little more detail would be better.

Re: Admiral Greenert Outlines FY14 Budget Priorities to HASC

PettyOfficer Allen — Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:38:00 -0000

Good morning Sir,
Thank you for standing up for your war-fighters and working tirelessly to provide the training and support my fellow Sailors and Marines need to adhere to your tenants. We will continue to do what is necessary to get the missions done in spite of the constraints that we are faced with. We will be ready!
Thank you for fighting for us. It is immensely appreciated.

Re: Admiral Greenert Outlines FY14 Budget Priorities to HASC

frank — Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:31:01 -0000

Thanks sir for the outstanding work and inspiration from you and your leadership.
We pray that the budget is enough to sustain the TA program. It's our hope for a better future. Thanks.

Re: Operate Forward: Our Navy’s Mandate

Bill Burns — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:18:14 -0000

I am curious why, if it requires four ships to keep one forward, it requires ten Arleigh Burkes to keep two forward?

Re: Warfighting First: What Does It Mean To You?

Lorrie Flather — Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:48:21 -0000

I am awed and full of pride at our Navy. My dad and grandson are Navy. I truly feel safe knowing the caliber of those at the helm of this amazing branch of our military. I pray for those who serve every day.

Re: Warfighting First: What Does It Mean To You?

richard sterzinger — Thu, 04 Apr 2013 07:15:57 -0000

Sound statement Admiral Keep up the Proud Tradition of alway's being ready and leading the way to our safety as a Nation.

Re: Warfighting First: What Does It Mean To You?

Damian Delaney — Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:42:26 -0000

This is damned good advice, and absolutely true every moment you're at sea or turning your ship around in port.

Re: Budget, Moving Forward

Alla Malushkova — Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:26:15 -0000

Примите мои искренние поздравления ..Вы действилельно человек с БОЛЬШОЙ БУКВЫ

Re: Warfighting First: What Does It Mean To You?

Alla Malushkova — Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:20:37 -0000

Дорогой Вильям..что бы не делали.. честь и хвала Вам

Re: HASC Hearing Opening Statement

Jsbandb — Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:57:36 -0000

Couldn't stand up for "your" Sailors when it came to the ERB, could you?

Re: HASC Hearing Opening Statement

Donnyandapril — Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:52:21 -0000

ERB - You already hurt your "folks".......

Re: HASC Hearing Opening Statement

Tgritsonis — Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:42:52 -0000

I hope they listen I joined in 2007 as well and am IRR status.

Re: HASC Hearing Opening Statement

Warren Broomall — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:14:24 -0000

come on Sam, who cares about the surface pukes, the, marines. Just kepp the nuke subs in the water.
As for the civilians, hey who cares about little areas like hawaii, san diego, Charleston..
Work at wallmart!!

Re: HASC Hearing Opening Statement

ABlevins080704 — Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:52:22 -0000

Although this will be my last year in the Navy, I hope that Congress takes these valid points stated by the CNO into consideration, because little did I know when I joined in 2007 that our country relies heavily upon the Navy to keep our waters safe, secure, and open for international trade; but what's more is that our country relies on all branches to work together to be a successful nation-then, now, and for many many more years to come!!! Hopefully the House Armed Services Committee can work this mess out for all branches!

Re: Kicking Off 2013

Irelandoverton — Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:12:16 -0000

I understand you're a very busy man & may not have the spare time to read every posting you receive. But, if you do happen upon this, after reading your statement titled: "Wellness, Trust and Care", I was moved to respond.

My husband & I were both Naval Corpsman, as well as my brother who served as a Navy Seal for 20 yrs.- only to return to work with the Seals as civilian personnel. We all found your finely summarized words encompass both the truth & necessary reality that ALL military personnel must live by. We all deeply believe in as well as strive to live up to this credo always.

Thank you for re-enforcing these beliefs that are truly vital in both military & in civilian life. For it is necessary to take care of & equally trust in those we serve with, live amongst, as well as ourselves. In doing our duties, we must always demonstrate our inner strength by acting in accordance with the beliefs we pledged to uphold- regardless of criticism. & aspire to the higher purpose we're called upon to pursue- protect & defend our strong & duly proud country as well as endangered countries outside of our borders with people's whose struggles we bravely join to fight with honor, courage, & commitment. Bravo Zulu, Admiral Greenerst. & may God protect you & yours as you do for all the many Sailors who serve under your leadership & command.

Re: Kicking Off 2013

Xivabg — Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:39:35 -0000

Was ERB really necessary? Since the budget is still the same from 2012.

Re: Kicking Off 2013

Scott Gladden — Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:39:51 -0000

CPO 365. really?

Re: Happy 237th Birthday Marine Corps

Felmaceda — Thu, 08 Nov 2012 06:39:23 -0000

Happy Birthday Anniversary! More power!

Re: Read To Be Ready!

Guest — Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:00:56 -0000

The CAINE MUTINY used to be required reading when I was on Active Duty. Looks like it is no longer on the list. Why was it removed ? It is the timeless story of a mediocre ship with a mediocre at best, Captain. However, if the CAINE's wardroom had stuck together and loyally supported their eccentric skipper, then this old, limited destroyer minesweeper would have muddled thru all her duties without the unnecessary trauma of a mutiny in the middle of a typhoon. Loyalty in combat and emergency situations, etc. is an absolute core requirement for our Navy. If Herman Wouk's Pulitzer Prize winning novel, the CAINE MUTINY has been removed, suggest it be restored to Required Reading List, at least for Officers and Chiefs.

Re: Commanding the Electromagnetic and Cyber Environment

Charles Lilly — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:24:19 -0000

Why did we dump NASA's Shuttle Program @ $3 billion, leaving our EMP Satellites vulnerable to laser or atomic destruction, now we have to hitch a ride with the Russians to service our few secret satellites that are vital to communications, navigation and strategic mapping or watching potential enemy threats? I just can't fathom the decision making for that one. Now we are going to privatize space? Sorry, I served in the USAF back when the Native Americans still had a foothold. I know that change is a constant and that's why things constently change, but I am distressed over this decision. Was it the Joint Chiefs of Staff or the White House? I'll bet you like to play chess, being a military maritimer, is this a good move or does your many Fleets have a backup plan? I am an old retired Engineer from NNS Reactor Plant and Planning Yard and NAVSEA at Carderock. I don't know anything about space, but I'm counting on your Naval Research Lab antenna Engineers to tell me what they are doing these days. The World is getting more dangerous every day. I'm counting on you guys to serve and save our Nation. Then when you come home from duty you can be old and retired like me.

Re: Read To Be Ready!

Paul Felix Schott — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:54:39 -0000

let us all also read the bible while we still can.

The lord's little helper
Paul Felix Schott

Re: Afloat Forward Staging Bases

Monster — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:44:47 -0000

so there will be two MPL and two AFSB now?

Re: Read To Be Ready!

Donnoraini — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:20:44 -0000

I've read the books Arleigh Burke, and Two Ocean War which were really fantastic books to read. Something I highly recommend.

Re: Happy Birthday, Shipmates

Ourstuff63 — Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:47:51 -0000

236...I think most feel this is the 237th Birthday.

Re: Commemorating the Battle of Midway

Conleysa — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:29:46 -0000

I was on the USS Midway CV-41 from 1977 - 1979, now a museum in San Diego, I think putting a wreath on her for the 70th anniversary of the Battle of Midway is a great idea!